Talk:Electronics
From MeritBadgeDotOrg
(Difference between revisions)
m ({{Talk}}, {{Unsigned}} and reply...) |
m (→Printing error in 2010 Boy Scout Requirements Book: Pending verification) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Thanks for that note! This is important enough to post a note on the article page itself. —'''''[[User:RWSmith|RWSmith]]''''' ''[[MeritBadgeDotOrg:Bureaucrat|(Bureaucrat)]]'', 23:35, June 16, 2010 (EDT) | :Thanks for that note! This is important enough to post a note on the article page itself. —'''''[[User:RWSmith|RWSmith]]''''' ''[[MeritBadgeDotOrg:Bureaucrat|(Bureaucrat)]]'', 23:35, June 16, 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::'''Follow-up note!''' I'm attempting to officially verify this, by the way. Not that I doubt you. All my sources (Scouting.Org, USScouts.Org, and the worksheets have "Show how..." (under #4c) as a separate line, but still, an overall part of req. 4. Then #5 and #6, but no #7. When considering the context of the requirements, the part in question could go either way... numbered (separately) as #5, or part of #4, overall. '''Notably, this "part" alone looks "funky" on Scouting.Org.''' I will post an update here when I get the verifiaction, one way, or the other. —'''''[[User:RWSmith|RWSmith]]''''' ''[[MeritBadgeDotOrg:Bureaucrat|(Bureaucrat)]]'', 00:08, June 17, 2010 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:08, June 17, 2010
| | Please familiarize yourself with Help:Talk pages before posting on discussion (a.k.a. talk) pages. — Use headings, indentations; and please, always sign (~~~~) your posts. (See Help:Talk pages for details.) — Ask your Scouting/advancement-related questions on our forums... several Scouters will be happy to help you. |
|
|
Printing error in 2010 Boy Scout Requirements Book
Please be aware there is a misnumbering in the printed copy of the 2010 Boy Scout Requirements Book for the Electronics Merit Badge. The numeral for #5 "Show how..." is missing making it appear to be part of 4(c). Also resulting in #6 incorrectly numbered as number 5 and similarly #7 incorrectly numbered as number 6. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertMorris (talk • contribs) June 16, 2010. (Please, sign and date your posts on talk pages.)
- Thanks for that note! This is important enough to post a note on the article page itself. —RWSmith (Bureaucrat), 23:35, June 16, 2010 (EDT)
- Follow-up note! I'm attempting to officially verify this, by the way. Not that I doubt you. All my sources (Scouting.Org, USScouts.Org, and the worksheets have "Show how..." (under #4c) as a separate line, but still, an overall part of req. 4. Then #5 and #6, but no #7. When considering the context of the requirements, the part in question could go either way... numbered (separately) as #5, or part of #4, overall. Notably, this "part" alone looks "funky" on Scouting.Org. I will post an update here when I get the verifiaction, one way, or the other. —RWSmith (Bureaucrat), 00:08, June 17, 2010 (EDT)

